On August 5th of this month, the much-discussed, cumbersome, and nebulous agreement between the United Kingdom and France on illegal immigration finally came into force. The governments of Keir Starmer, an aristocratic member of the Fabian Society, and Emmanuel Macron, a technocrat-Jesuit heir apparent of the Rothschild family and the political creation of the eminence grise of French politics, Jacques Attali, have regained prominence on the international stage, shaping a new contemporary “Entente Cordiale.”
Brexit, which had sealed the illusory liberation of England from the Eurocrats of Brussels, far from being a panacea for all the ills afflicting the island empire, only left open a series of unresolved political issues: foreign policy coordination with allies, tariff and customs issues between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, and of course the fight against illegal immigration. While Downing Street had initially looked overseas, attempting to restore the so-called “special relationship” with its American ally, the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House and the consequent wholesale relocation of the globalist elite to London had as its inevitable corollary a shift in British foreign policy, which sought to play sides with the chancelleries of Paris and Berlin.
And the French Republic itself, afflicted by a social and economic crisis mirroring the one unfolding across the Channel, has accepted the British Labour Party’s proposals, initiating a symbiotic coordination in many sectors. Both leaders, whose popularity among the national electorate is plummeting and whose approval ratings are below 25%, have opted for a forceful and forceful response to the unresolved problems that are tearing their societies apart from within.
Illegal immigration, along with the constant and rapid Islamization of entire franco-british cities, with neighborhoods removed from the control of the state and the police, accompanied by episodes of brutal violence against native citizens, especially women, adolescents, and pensioners, have shocked national public opinion, always hypocritical and right-thinking.
The usual do-gooder and inclusive propaganda, this time, has failed in its usual operation of installing “Orwellian doublethink” and “cognitive dissonance” in the fragile minds of its citizen-subjects, continuously spewing out on national channels the same pseudo-narrative stuffed with ethnic hatred, racism, resurgent fascism, and eugenics straight from the “woke” manuals developed at the Tavistock Institute in London.
Despite the establishment of the “thought crime” of free or non-compliant thought, resulting in social media censorship, fines, and arrests in both England and France, where they banned the Rumble platform and arrested Telegram creator Pavel Durov, the problem of illegal immigration has reached such colossal proportions that it cannot simply be dismissed as propaganda serving ultra-populist right-wing parties.
The answer to a problem created and fueled ad hoc by stateless globalist circles, notorious for the funding of NGOs by the European Union, USAID, and pseudo-philanthropists like George Soros, was the signing of this immigration treaty between Europe’s only two nuclear powers. The international treaty signed is completely useless and does not serve in any way to resolve a phenomenon that has now taken on the characteristics of ethnic replacement of the European population as hoped for by the enlightened Freemason Richard Nikolaus Graf von Coudenhove-Kalergi in his work “Practical Idealism”.
The cornerstone of the agreement is the “one in, one out” principle, meaning that the number of migrants accepted by France will be limited to the same number as those expelled from Britain and repatriated to France. The commitment is to detain and transfer to France an “illegal immigrant” who arrives on the english coast aboard a small boat, in exchange for which the british authorities will welcome an asylum seeker camped across the Channel who has passed security and suitability checks and who has family members capable of supporting them in the UK.
British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, however, did not indicate the number of migrants covered by the agreement, sparking renewed controversy over the plan’s effectiveness. A preliminary report suggests that only around 50 migrants a week will be allowed to return to France, meaning a total of around 2,350 will be repatriated before the agreement expires in June next year. This figure is far lower than the more than 25,000 migrants who have arrived in Britain by dinghy since the beginning of this year, a 49% increase compared to the same period last year. Conservative Shadow Home Secretary Chris Phillip criticized the agreement, calling it “an open door” to illegal immigration. He expressed concern about the lack of clarity regarding the handling of rejected asylum claims, or whether Britain can deport rejected migrants to France due to legal disputes.
Despite the hype with which this innovative pact against illegal immigration has been presented, it is a pure act of demagogy aimed at snatching a poisoned arrow from the quiver of populist and sovereignist movements, with Farage’s Reform UK party on an unstoppable rise in the polls.
From a reading of the document, it appears to be conducive only to sterile debates between the “Taliban” of indiscriminate acceptance, the “Open Borders” idealists—a ragtag bunch of young men with confused ideas and sexualities, old hippies, and bored radical chic—on the one hand; and bourgeois liberal conservatives on the other, who turn up their noses at radical positions and delude themselves into thinking they can resolve an explosive situation with cosmetic legal measures. The core flaw in the issue lies precisely in Brexit, desired by the people, and in the inability of the Conservative and Labour ruling classes to decisively address the ongoing ethnic suicide.
One of the main reasons for the increase in irregular migrant arrivals is the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union in 2020. Since the UK is no longer part of the EU, it is no longer subject to the Dublin Regulation, a system designed to return asylum seekers to their EU country of first arrival. Therefore, those who reach the UK, despite having passed through several EU countries and potentially applied for asylum in any of them, can still apply for protection in the UK without risking being returned to another transit country under the Dublin regulation.
And if this treaty therefore creates a legal loophole in a legislative vacuum regarding immigration within the United Kingdom, a few hundred repatriations or expulsions to France will not resolve the inter-ethnic chaos that reigns unchecked in “perfidious, foggy Albion”.
At the same time, sending a few hundred bogus asylum seekers across the English Channel or dismantling the makeshift shantytowns in Calais will not save the French people from imminent extinction. In England as in France, Sharia, the application of Islamic law, is already a parallel system of jurisdiction used in many neighborhoods where a large portion of “new generation” French and English people live estranged from the culture and traditions of their homeland.
The phenomenon of “grooming gangs,” organized gangs of pakistani and afghan rapists who racially target white British teenagers and young women, and who enjoy the connivance of institutions within which representatives of their community are already present (for example, the pakistani mayor Sadi Kahn in London), or the anti-white and christian racism of hip-hop singers from the french suburbs (for example, Nick Conrad, who urged the hanging of caucasians), are just a few paradigmatic examples.
Without even delving into the tortuous world of Islamic terrorism, with thousands of sleeper cells poised for martyrdom nesting in many european countries, the notorious summer camps for teenagers organized by the “Muslim Brotherhood” are centers for radicalism and the brainwashing of a new young workforce to be manipulated at will.
The de-Christianization of Europe with the overbearing demographic advancement and proselytism of Islam, the LGBTQ propaganda forcibly brought into schools and the military repression of any sovereignist and traditionalist movement or party represent the nails that are sealing French and British civilizations, and I would say almost all of Europe, in a coffin.
If the cyclical nature of history has forced these ancient colonial empires to be devoured alive by the populations they oppressed for centuries, we cannot, however, condemn to extinction and suppression cultures (European ones) that have gifted humanity with literary and philosophical works and, above all, entire proletarian classes that have never enjoyed any colonial privileges, given that the plundering of the colonies’ wealth was the exclusive prerogative of those same ruling classes who now, on the one hand, finance the invasion of the “Old Continent” and, on the other, sign ridiculous, insipid pieces of paper to perpetuate themselves in power.
