Apodictically, both the depths and the surfaces of the world system entered, more than a decade ago, into a combinatorial phase of changes and transformations such that the globalist monody, or the purpose of monopolizing the management of the world by the Anglo-American financial, economic, political, military and intellectual cliques (and their Eastern allies), no longer occupies command and control of the direction of history.

In other words, globalist centrism lost to global polyarchy for physical reasons related to the diversity of power and the development of history itself. This is not a mere statement or a narrative game, but rather the logical conclusion drawn from truthful and verifiable heuristics and hermeneutics devoid of mirages, fictions, and voluntarism dislocated from common sense and truth.

This opening of power and the functioning of the geopolitical pluriverse impact, to varying degrees, the multidimensional planes of Hispanic- Latin America, influencing this ecumene, which was historically connected to the geopolitics of the Atlantic and the towers of power of the United States, to participate in new and improved interrelations, cooperation, and diverse partnerships with state and private actors in the Indo-Pacific region.

When factions within the governing political and economic bodies of the countries of this America look towards the Indian Ocean and the Pacific and turn to the existing first- and second-order powers, in, for example, Asia, they do so motivated solely because they see in those emerging partners a different treatment with manifest respect for these americans, they see a serious promise of building geo-commercial and technological routes and bridges and they verify that they offer them a vision of participating in one way or another in international or global destinies.

While globalists in Britain and the United States attempt to impose neocolonial dictates and invectives on Hispanics and Latinos, Indo-Pacific nations speak to them about holistic and mutual progress in common formats (some novel, some old).

However, these globalists, unlike what happened between the 1950s and 1970s, with the maximum restart of the capitalist financial, industrial and commercial machinery, cannot grant the Hispanic-Latin states and peoples of today a range of benefits, even relative ones, because, in the same Anglo-American center of power, it was imposed and dominated internally -until at least 2024-, the predatory and extractive scheme that only seeks to absorb all the income and profits of such people, without providing them with real resources or incentivizing them to get out of debt, reindustrialize somewhat, and rebuild their entire infrastructure.

The supranational geopolitics of Anglo-American power formations minimized the Spanish-Latin states so much that they pushed them further to the margins of the periphery of the global system.

This harsh and painful reality for those who have suffered and continue to suffer explains why there is greater cooperation between the states of the Indo-Pacific region and their counterparts in Hispanic- Latin America. These commitments are increasing, despite the setbacks and opposing factors that prevent this sensible macro-coordination from being maximized.

Naturally, the types and volumes of trade between non-Anglo-Saxon America and the Atlantic region will steadily and sharply decline as other collateral processes of the global order advance and as Hispanic-Latin American geo-commercial agreements with the Indo-Pacific region progress concurrently.

One of the external phenomena affecting this bilateral relationship being built between these two blocs, and which could act as an accelerator for strengthening the partnership, is the economic collapse in Western Europe and Great Britain. If this semi-bankruptcy or bankruptcy becomes a reality, European and British purchasing power will decline significantly, affecting foreign trade with Latin America. And the latter region will, in fact, be more interested in expanding trade with the Indo-Pacific.

A question that might arise in the minds of readers of this article concerns the role of the Trump project and the US economic and military elites in the Indo-Pacific and whether that role could disrupt and frustrate this growing partnership.

Without intending to predict the future, we assess that this process will continue and grow because Anglo-American centripetalism will not have the capacity to nullify it, no matter how hard it tries.

In short, polyarchy in the global management system is an inevitable fact, as is the strategic and, primarily, geocommercial interaction between non-Anglo-Saxon America and the Indo-Pacific.