Since the Hamas attacks in October 2023 and the subsequent oversized Israeli reaction, whose government not only does not hide, but publicly boasts of not relenting until it destroys, occupies and subjugates Gaza forever, recognition of the “Palestinian State” has increased, reaching a total of 157 of the 193 UN member states (81%) –of the five that make up the Security Council, and therefore have veto power, only the US is missing–; Israel is recognized by 164 (85%).

While such a fact might suggest that the final creation of such a “Palestinian state” might not be far off, always in accordance with the borders agreed upon by the UN in 1967 and with East Jerusalem as its capital, we do not believe it is in any way possible for at least the following main reasons:

First: None of the countries that have publicly recognized the “Palestinian State” have dared to suggest even the slightest bit of the necessary and timely “roadmap” to achieve it – that is, how to physically establish a State as such in such territory, that is, with a state territory, a state people and a state authority –, so that such recognitions do not seem sincere, obeying more a circumstantial and urgent interest of their leaders pressured by the horror that little by little penetrates among the citizens of their respective countries in the face of the news – and above all images – of the carnage and destruction that the Israeli invasion has been causing in Gaza for two years now.

Second: Israel, in reality, is not just a Jewish state, but much more: a Zionist state, the nerve center of such globalist ideology and doctrine in the Middle East, the same one that pulls the strings of American globalism, whose full support it will always have, regardless of who occupies the White House, for reasons of coincidence of roots, interests and aims always in pursuit of global domination.

Third: Israel will never accept the existence of a “Palestinian state” in any form; last year the Knesset rejected such a possibility by 62 votes to 9, going so far as to approve a declaration that a “Palestinian state” would be “an existential threat to Israel” and “firmly” rejecting its establishment.

Fourth: Given Israel’s expansion from 1948 to the present, occupying the majority of the territory that was supposed to form the “Palestinian State,” it is now materially impossible to return these territories to the Palestinians without provoking a humanitarian catastrophe, including widespread bloodshed, for which no one would be willing to accept responsibility. What’s more, let’s not even mention the impossibility of peaceful and civilized coexistence between two such radicalized peoples, both of whom have horribly shed so much blood.

Fifth: A “Palestinian state” would cause a turning point of catastrophic proportions and consequences for the entire Middle East, which would not only jeopardize the current Israeli-American monopoly on such an important area and the stability of the countries that comprise it, especially after the fall of the Syrian regime (only Iran remains, a regime that is barely able to fight for survival), but would also seriously affect the world economy for obvious reasons.

For all these reasons, I repeat, I believe that the conditions are not even minimally required for the recognition of the proposed creation of the “Palestinian State” to be effective either now or in the long term.