On October 31, the United Nations Security Council publicly and definitively removed its mask and showed its full obedience to the United States. In doing so, it enshrined its renunciation of international law, including that emanating from its own resolutions. And it did so through Resolution 2797 (2025), which, in itself and formally, is mainly a one-year extension of the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO).
And it happened a week before the fiftieth anniversary of the so-called Green March, that is, the invasion by force of the Spanish Sahara, with the explicit betrayal of Prince Juan Carlos de Borbón in between, as acting Head of State, and the beginning of the massacre of the Saharawi people, who had been Spanish in their own right since 1958. The Synarchy [i] has always had a special inclination for significant dates and for the perverse gloating that they entail.
The Referendum on Self-Determination of Western Sahara
Rather, resolution 2797 formally deals with the referendum on self-determination that the UN has been advocating since 1960 (it considered Spanish Sahara a “non-self-governing territory” in 1961). The Saharawi Jemaá (local political body) publicly and solemnly rejected the intervention of the UN, in November and December 1966, before the “Committee of 24” and the “Commission of Non-Self-Governing Territories”.
There he also presented the results of the referendum on November 18 held that year [ii], in which more than 90% of Sahrawis over 18 years of age voted for union with Spain. For it, the first census in the area had been rigorously and expressly carried out.
But, of course, that did not please the US, the true ‘father’ of today’s Morocco by having forced its independence (and then did it with Ifni and Equatorial Guinea … and many other “carefully selected” territories [iii]). And just as he currently does not like the referendum (right of self-determination) that the UN decreed by its Resolution 1514 (XV) of December 14, 1960. In 1972, the United Nations General Assembly, by its Resolution A/RES/2983, recognised the right to self-determination and independence of the people of the Spanish Sahara.
In 1974, Spain, as the administering power, announced to the UN that it would hold the referendum in the first half of 1975, but Morocco and Mauritania opposed it, arguing that the territory was part of its “territorial integrity” before the Spanish presence, so the opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was requested.
The Hague Tribunal, in its opinion of 16 October 1975 [iv], rejected the claims of Morocco and Mauritania regarding their alleged sovereignty prior to the Spanish presence in 1884, concluding that Spain did not colonize a land “of no man” (terra nullius), since it agreed to its presence with free and independent tribes of the territory without ties of sovereignty with the Sultan(s) of Morocco [v]. Concluding that the application of Resolution 1514 (referendum) did not threaten the territorial integrity of the claimant states.
But, there go laws, where they want kings, that [vi]is, what the Synarchy imposes is done through its main executive arm, period. Morocco, promoted by the USA and England (and France), carried out the annexation of the territory (Province No. 53 of Spain) with a ‘peaceful’ invasion called the Green March (originally “White March”, arising from the Tavistock Institute or one associated with it). A move that the Saxons logistically supported with funding from Saudi Arabia. And that was simultaneous with the invasion of native villages with blood and fire, while the Spanish military forces ceded the field to what until then had been their undisguised enemy. Of course, with the approval of the Saxonized Spanish political forces that awaited the imminent death of the Caudillo. And with the silent consent of that UN so concerned about “the people of the Spanish Sahara”.
Then came 16 years of Mauritanian-Moroccan war against the Arab Socialist Democratic Republic (SADR, which in 1985 was recognised by 61 nations and was a member of the Organisation of African Unity), which ended in a draw only thanks to ‘Western’ support (the US and its allies, especially Israel; 13 nations provided military aid) and the construction of a defensive ‘wall’ almost 3,000 km long.
At the same time, Morocco imposed a policy of terror in the occupied zone with mass executions and torture that almost no one talks about [vii]. Meanwhile, the Alawi regime attacked Spanish interests and expelled our fishing boats from the Canarian-Saharan Fishing Bank through covert terrorism.
The cessation of hostilities in 1991 was based on a commitment to the United Nations to hold the referendum. MINURSO was established that year by Security Council Resolution 690.
The Case of East Timor
Almost simultaneously with the Green March, and taking advantage of the Portuguese Carnation Revolution, Portuguese Timor became independent in November 1975, mainly at the hands of FRETILIN, a social-communist movement similar to the FPolisario. Just a month later it was invaded by Indonesia, with the support of the US (sound familiar?) and Australia, and annexed as a province.
To Spain’s shame, Portugal defended the people of Timor and managed to get the UN to sponsor a referendum on self-determination in 1999. As a result of which, after a period of administration by the United Nations, East Timor became a sovereign state in May 2002. Any resemblance to Western Sahara?
Other aspects of Resolution 2797 (2025)
The resolution was clearly and publicly promoted by the United States, being approved with its vote and ten more (England and France, of course?, Denmark, Greece, Slovenia, South Korea, Panama, Guyana, Sierra Leone and Somalia), three abstentions (Russia and China and Pakistan), and one absence, that of Algeria, as a sign of radical opposition.
It is striking that Russia and China, every day suffer more invectives from the USA and its allies (Russia including the “war for proxies”), did not veto it, since the Maghreb area, and the surroundings of Gibraltar, are of vital strategic importance, in addition to the fact that the degenerate action of the UN demanded it.
Curiously (or not so much), it is practically impossible to find the full text [viii] of 2797 (2025), both on UN and other websites.
R. 2797 unmasks the UN, which shamelessly aligns itself with Morocco in its preamble, “reiterating its full support for the Moroccan Autonomy Initiative, presented in 2007, considering it a realistic, just and lasting solution to end the regional dispute”. A solution that can be anything but just and lasting, since it enshrines the military occupation and massacre of the only territory that is still a colony in Africa against international law and its own commitment to the referendum.
And because, as SADR said in 2021 in its Memorandum on the latest developments in Western Sahara [ix],”only peace based on full adherence to the principles of international law, and on the freedom and equal rights of small and large nations, can be viable and lasting.”
The aforementioned Alawi “Autonomy Initiative” is based on Morocco being considered the full sovereign owner of what it calls “southern provinces”, to which it would graciously give a predetermined autonomy.
As a whole, barely underhanded and sibylline, the resolution supersedes the referendum as an obligatory outcome, placing it as one of the possible options, and precisely not the recommended one.
The triumph is not for Morocco, which is a supporting actor like most of the US’s “allies”, because it has been Washington that, since 1956, has decided and promoted Alawi politics. R. 2797 is nothing more than the formal Yankee imposition on the UN, by Trump, of openly supporting Moroccan sovereignty over the Sahara since 2020, accompanied by the opening of consulates in cities such as Villa Cisneros (Dakhla) and El Aaiún, and the expansion of the inexhaustible waterfall of military aid.
France did so in 2024 [x] and England in 2025 [xi], in addition to Germany (2022; in practice the European Union, due to its policy of priority purchase of Sahrawi products) and, imposing it on the United States, Israel (Abraham Accords, 2020).
Consequences of the UN’s position
With Resolution 2797 (2025) CS, the UN enshrines in practice “the principle of International Illegality“: you can invade and massacre that, in the end and depending on who you are, you will have the barely disguised blessings of the UN.
I am talking about Morocco, of course, because Morocco’s de facto appropriation (theft) of Western Sahara and the waters of the Canary Sea, with the mineral riches of its seabed, and opening the way to the annexation of those Spanish provinces, is enshrined. A new chapter in the centuries-old animosity against Spain, demonstrated by the fact that the last colonies in the world are Spanish (Gibraltar, Sahara, Puerto Rico, the Marianas and Guam). Spain must leave NATO, the EU and the UN.
And of Israel, the state with the most convictions and unfulfilled resolutions (almost a hundred) and that is giving us a terrifying and endless genocide live and direct, for being the one who has promoted, with the complicity of the United States as mere instrumental support, the resolution that concerns us.
International law has been broken and the inaugurated New World Order regresses to the shameless empire of force. One more knock on the door of the imminence of the Third World War.
[i] Perón and the Synarchy, https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNdw5xCMU/. The 2nd meaning of the dictionary of the RAE says: “Influence, generally decisive, of a group of commercial companies or powerful people in the political and economic affairs of a country”; here we are talking about the Shadow World Government or, if you prefer, the Synagogue of Satan.
[ii] https://www.elespañoldigital.com/escrito-para-la-historia-el-abandono-del-sahara/
[iii] This is not the place here to go into detail, but the reader can see on the internet how many French, English and North American territories there are outside their respective continents, and many of them, such as Puerto Rico, subject to ‘frozen’ decolonization processes.
[iv] https://www.iri.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/fallo-sahara.pdf
[v] The Cervera-Quiroga-Rizo expedition obtained from the Emir of Adraˉr Tmar, in July 1886, the “Treaties of Iyil”, which placed some 700,000 km2 (more than the Spanish Peninsula) under Spanish sovereignty. The Sagasta government, the same one of the Betrayal of 98 (which is not a “disaster”), an Anglophile and a 33rd degree Freemason, did not notify the European powers, thus failing to comply with the conditions imposed by the Berlin Conference, and adding one more betrayal to its record. The Spanish presence was reduced by England and France in the treaties of 1900, 1902, 1904 and 1912, assumed by the submissive liberal governments.
[vi] Spanish proverb, https://cvc.cervantes.es/lengua/refranero/ficha.aspx?Par=58200&Lng=0 .
[vii] Amnesty International (https://www.derechos.net/amnesty/doc/mona/marruecos1.html). El País, March 13, 2013 (https://elpais.com/politica/2013/03/13/actualidad/1363178079_660651.html). Etc
[viii] https://chamaly.ma/2025/10/31/texte-integral-de-la-resolution-du-conseil-de-securite-de-lonu-sur-linitiative-marocaine-dautonomie-au-sahara-marocain/
[ix] The umpteenth violation in 2016 by Morocco of the ceasefire agreements by opening a border crossing with Mauritania in Guerguerat, not contemplated in them or in MINURSO’s Military Agreement No. 1 (1997/98) and as the UN Secretary-General warned in report S/2001/398. That reopened the war again. https://espacioseuropeos.com/2021/09/memorandum-sobre-los-ultimos-acontecimientos-en-el-sahara-occidental/
[x] France updates the map of Morocco and reaffirms its recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara (Atalayar, 31-X-2024).
[xi] UK backs Moroccan autonomy plan for Western Sahara (Deciphering War, 3 June 2025)
