On April 18, 2027, the French will be called upon to elect a new President of the Republic. Fortunately, Emmanuel Macron will not be able to run again. But before looking at the contenders to succeed him, let’s look at the France he leaves behind.

• An over-indebted France, where public debt has risen to the highest levels ever reached.
• A France where housing, food, heating and travel are increasingly weighing on budgets.
• A France where public services are deteriorating; a France where hospitals lack staff and resources, and worse, have the right to kill patients even against their will; a France where schools struggle to properly train students and where even the youngest children are taught sexual practices.
• A France whose farmers periodically show their despair and where many retirees dread each end of the month.
• Our diplomacy has lost almost all of the independence and the publicity it could claim.
• Our foreign policy is dependent on Zionism, Atlanticism and this tyrannical European Union.

But the crisis is as much moral and political.

• Abortion has been enshrined in the Constitution.
• The National Assembly and the Council of State have just definitively adopted the appalling text instituting euthanasia.
• Our social networks will now be subject to censorship and surveillance under the official pretext of control that belongs to parents, not the state.
• The most depraved postures have the right to be heard, even in our churches.
• The irrational and incredibly expensive support of several tens of billions for Ukraine contributes greatly to the impoverishment of the French.
• The completely crazy project of a war against Russia has taken hold, while military budgets are reaching unprecedented sums in France.

So, who, among the already known candidates, will offer us a total and real break, accompanied by the means to assume it?

The National Rally?

He has made his program perfectly conformist or consensual. On the Union European the euro, NATO, it represents no alternative.

On major societal issues and traditional values, he is like the others. Even on social media censorship, he voted with the pack.

Bruno Retailleau and the Republican leaders?

A right-wing that appears conservative, certainly, but which remains the product of a political family that has governed France for decades without fundamentally questioning the implementations whose consequences it denounces today. And who has also pledged allegiance to Zionism and Atlanticism and to the Freemasonry. His opposition is only a façade.

Édouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal, often named in the corridors?

But how can we imagine a radical break with Macronism when we were Prime Minister minister, and not so good? And then how do these people, some of whom have a problem

with the justice system, can they assume to solve the problems left by Macronia?

Raphaël Glucksmann and the social democratic left? Their Europeanism, their assumed Atlanticism and their lack of Christian values belong precisely to the system that makes the French unhappy.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon and La France Insoumise? Behind the rhetoric of rupture remains a radical left, heir to a totally revolutionary tradition, whose conception of society, immigration, secularism and social relations, is the antithesis of the French people’s need for peace.

As for the famous “center”, which some are currently promoting, it has the astonishing political particularity of claiming to go beyond the right and the left while renewing, for years, the essential orientations that have led to the present situation. Acratopèges, as wine tasters say: neither taste nor smell…

There remains the ritual argument: it will be necessary to vote for “the lesser evil“. But the lesser evil is still an evil! Even less! We must not vote for an evil! This notion is moreover condemned by the Church and I urge the curious to research and study the famous Father Barbier on this subject.

No new candidacy will upset this political offer between now and April 18, and there is no reason to give one’s vote to someone who we know in advance will not defend the essential of what is necessary for the happiness of the French.

But this observation does not impose despair, passivity, or withdrawal from the city.

Because France is not just about the state. It exists in our families, our communes, our associations, our parishes, our professions, our heritage, our solidarity and our friendships. This is what we call civil society. Let us therefore rebuild, wherever we can, this French civil society. Organize yourself to survive with as little government as possible, while waiting for better days. And stop believing that you have to vote or that your vote will be useful.

This year it will be harmful, in any case.

It is from this civil society that tomorrow will emerge the men capable of finally carrying out a great national plan and of giving back to the French people what these evildoers have taken away from them.

—-

Olivier Rouot has published a book on voting that can shed light on this question of choices for 2027: You will not vote.

This book can be found:

 – Or at Amazon:

 – Or at his publisher:

https://lesbonslivrespourtous.com/categorie-produit/politique