Given the situation in the world, what would be normal and foreseeable would be a rise in anti-Yankee and anti-Zionist sentiment within the bloc itself subject to the Western Empire. That sentiment is popular, contrary to the wishes of the ruling elites. Unfortunately, it has not yet crystallized into an organized protest movement.

Optimistic analyses of the strength of the BRICS and their role as agents of construction of a new World Order emphasize the palpable fact that in much of the globe, approximately half, the United States and the “values of the West” are no longer taken as a guide. The United States does not lead any positive objective, it is not a power that can serve as a guide, either voluntarily or forcefully. On the contrary, in that half of the world freed from Yankee colonialism, alien to the Empire, modes of exchange (commercial and financial, energy, diplomatic, institutional, etc.) are being developed, very different from those of the Americas, modes divergent from those imposed by the American giant after 1945. Halfway around the world there is a growing feeling among the peoples of the Global South and the BRICS: the awareness of being able to live outside the dollar cage. This article deals with whether within the Western cage that consciousness – also growing – can organize against the dominant elites, and make common cause with the already liberated peoples.

Western Europe and a large part of Latin America are inside the cage of the dollar (and the euro), of Atlanticism, of liberalism, of Empire. It is the time of the People.

Inside, as well as outside the West, there should be an effective de-Americanization of these other large regions of the planet. In the Global South and in the BRICS countries it is happening, and we have to connect with that current.

The fall of the USSR and the immediate discrediting of the so-called “real socialism” from 1989 onwards implied the arrival of a superficial and accelerated neoliberal and Western wave in countries that had not suffered the intense and perforating processes of Americanization of Western Europe and Latin America. In Russia and in many Slavic, Asian, African, etc. countries, the advent of more or less democratic regimes but, in any case, protectors of national identity and economy, regimes that moved away from the (neo)liberal standard of the Anglo-Saxon stamp, proved to be crucial. Putin’s Russia and post-Maoist China led this estrangement.

In Western Europe and in much of Latin America, the situation is quite different. The possibilities of moving away from the Anglo-Saxon (neo)liberal standard were reduced after World War II by this combination of coups d’état, selective attacks, the creation of guerrillas and paramilitary forces, co-optation of leaders and parties, color revolutions, “educational programs” and the entire cast, in short, of soft power of which the Yankees have been consummate masters. In my country, Spain, let us see here by way of example, there is much to investigate about the bloody and punctual changes of direction that prevented an evolution of Francoist Spain towards a more open but sovereign, socialist, quasi-Peronist or quasi-Gaullist regime. The assassination of Admiral Carrero, the foreign financing of the terrorist and racist group ETA, the role of the Bourbon, the Atocha attacks, the military coup attempt of 23F in 1981… All these facts will always sow numerous doubts in the collective unconscious of the Spanish people, a people who, no matter how dumbed down they have been under Yankee soft power for decades, will always suspect that the bloodless influence (soft power) was not enough to pilot the Spanish ship in a clearly Atlanticist direction. And violence – punctual or generalized – is always an option of the Yankees to ensure the vassalage of defeated nations, reduced to the status of colonies.

In the Western Empire bloc, popular stupefaction is increasing for the moment. Europeans who have not been captured by their elites observe with astonishment that the financial resources that should be channelled towards social ends, as ordered by all their Constitutional Charters, are destined for unjustified rearmament. All this without popular approval or scrutiny, the dictator Zelensky and his Nazi battalions receive a lot of military and financial aid that “democratic” Europe needs for its own social stability. A Europe impoverished at a rapid pace, deindustrialized by a suicidal policy that strives to please the Yankees and anger the Russians, contravening basic interests such as energy security (cheap gas and oil) and positive exchange with Russia. Europe is striving to confront the other Europe, the Russian Federation, to the advantage of a non-European and anti-European Empire, which has occupied half the continent since 1945.

Europe is determined to fight a war like the one in Ukraine that could perfectly well have been avoided. A war that was artificially sought and prolonged – until today – . The tailing of the “Europeanist” but anti-European elites, the submission to the dictates of the Empire have brought war to our continent.

At the gates of this Western Europe, a scenario of horror and shame, horror and criminal guilt continues to unfold from which the elites will not be able to escape, unless Western societies themselves have already died at all levels (politically and ethically, above all). The purging of this entire geopolitical scenario will only be possible with a new trial in Nuremberg, an exemplary and exemplary process where the “Europeanist” elites are held accountable for their criminal complicity in this humanitarian disaster. Today, this end seems utopian given that the elites of Brussels and European capitals seem very screwed to their seats. They hold on tightly to the armchair by enacting increasingly authoritarian laws, sucking sovereignty from countries and increasing the mechanisms of interference in democratic elections, promoting the prohibition of political parties, exercising the suppression of dissent, etc. In addition, his anxious grip on power and the fear of the “hypothetical Nuremberg” are very clearly perceived, trusting that Donald Trump’s interim will give way to another Yankee administration, neoconservative or Sorosian, or of whatever sign, but less disconcerting for the power of Brussels and its axes in Berlin or Paris. But these elites, increasingly autocratic, must now count on the growing disaffection of the governed. Their strength is their weakness, at the same time. Someday they will have their peoples against them, while they depend on the internal balances of the very heart of the Empire. In the United States, power is splitting into factions, and the decline shown abroad will at some point be transferred to the internal viscera of Washington.

Western Europe has been facing multiple chaos for years, which is the result of its directed alienation. The EU is a non-national entity, not legitimately backed by a popular power. As a supposedly supra-national entity, it has done nothing more than suck sovereignty from the nation-states that constitute that bureaucratic and autocratic entity. In exchange, the sovereignty usurped by this Leviathan returns to nations and peoples, asymmetrically, the effects of their will to lordship, and it does so in the form of impositions not controlled or limited by governments, peoples, Constitutional Charters or any other body.

The pro-European elite sets itself up and shields itself through mechanisms of unappealable authority. But the people will see that this elite is the true effigy, now without masks, of a military entity designed since the end of World War II, with a double purpose: to subject Europe to Yankee designs (with France balancing possible “wild” booms in Germany), and at the same time to contain Russia, whose fusion with Germany (and with it,  Europe) would be the end of any claim to domination over the great Eurasian mass by the thalassocracy. Thalassocracy, the power of the seas and the anaconda that suffocates Eurasia, is a system of which the United States is today the absolute master. Our united Eurasia (Europe reunited with Russia and allied with China) would be the irrevocable end of Anglo-Saxon thalassocratic power.

The “Europeanist” elites are actually a layer of paid employees run by the predatory financial lobbies and command centers of the Anglosphere and Zionism. They are “nomads” from the end of Western civilization in the Spenglerian sense. They lack any kind of roots, and it is in their interest not to possess it. Neither roots nor any other burden. Many of these foremen of the pro-European farmhouse show off their nomadic cosmopolitanism, which makes them feel superior to the “reprehensible”. They themselves branded as “reprehensible” farmers and impoverished working classes and middle classes, oblivious to the benefits of a new aristocracy created by “woke” social engineers (“trans” artists, leaders of miscegenation, homosexual bohemians, etc.) Often the masters by delegation in the EU are simple crooks, commission agents who take millionaire slices of shady businesses, in which the lives of entire peoples are at stake.

The court cases that overwhelm the former president of the Spanish government, Rodríguez Zapatero, or the current one, Pedro Sánchez, are symptomatic of this type of political caste, overrepresented by the “progressives”. At all times they applied economic and labor reforms to the detriment of the working class. On every occasion when they had the opportunity to decide, they aligned themselves with rampant neoliberalism, with ferocious Atlanticism, with large multinationals and vulture funds. Criminals and traitors like Zapatero and Sánchez and hundreds of “progressives” like them loot their own country, chasing around all the ministries to leave them empty of funds, and then, after a millionaire retirement in charge of the taxes bled to the people, they will continue to suck, for the services rendered, from the revenues of the large predatory companies that have nothing European and a lot of “globalists” and Atlanticists. They also aspire to a golden retirement in the great gold cemeteries of the thieving caste that governs Europe: international, Europeanist, Atlanticist and even humanitarian organizations. The trajectory of the leaders of the liberal right (Aznar) is similar to that of the left. The people, in their hygienic and revolutionary work, must not distinguish between left and right. The partitocracy itself is a mechanism of submission to the Empire, and it was so even in times when the system was designed, while General Franco was alive, under a supposed clandestinity.

The pro-European caste shows its chest and extends peacock tails by representing so-called progressive values. The aforementioned Zapatero and Sánchez brought their people “achievements” that only a minority demanded (the so-called “homosexual marriage”, almost unrestricted abortion, euthanasia, eviction of Franco’s remains, open borders to all kinds of intruders, and also with the right to welcome pay…), “achievements” that in no way strengthen civil society, in no way protect it against neoliberal onslaughts or serve its development as a power. But such supposed advances grant credentials of progressivism that immunize them from any suspicion of corruption and treason, and dazzle many “beautiful souls.” They are full of “beautiful souls” of a squalid left, reduced to checkered. Those who are not rogues in positions of command, are “beautiful souls” who do not want to bathe in the murky water of reality.

The proof that the so-called pro-European elites are, in a large number of their members, confessed thieves, we have not only in Spain. In France and Italy there are also many cases of ministers, and senior leaders who, once they have left office, eventually succumb to a justice system that, although slow and corrupt in part, is a power that ends up doing its job. The very fact that so many leaders fall from grace reveals their status as mere employees at the service of higher and hidden powers, of anonymous individuals and consortiums, who hide behind such vulgar commission agents who pretend to represent their countries.

In addition to being commission agents and influence peddlers, they are traitors. The Bourbon or Zapatero sold pieces of Spain to the Sultanate of Morocco, to the silent laughter of Americans and French. If they are not provinces (“former colonies”) they sell sovereign information on a daily basis. Western Europe, and a large part of Latin America (which is also “the West” and suffers under the boots of Uncle Sam) has generated this political class not because of a kind of moral deficiency that, like physical pathologies, occurs without anyone’s guilt, an evil that was only attributable to necessary physical causes. The moral deficiency of the ruling castes of Europeanism is induced, created; it is a clear case of sepoy government. When the Yankee Empire landed in Europe in the two world wars, and definitely in World War II, this power designed a very specific and planned form of control of the continent, with a degree of subtlety that it had not practiced in other territories that the Yankees had already taken as colonies.

The domination of Europe had to be done in a different way, not as in the other precedents. The genocides committed by the Yankees in the Caribbean, on the islands taken from Spain in the 1898 war, which they were supposed to liberate, were not at all subtle. And the number of murders in the Philippines, close to one million, once this Asian people knew the misfortune of passing from Hispanic to American domination, in the years after this fateful 98, is terrifying. There was no Nuremberg for the Yankees of 1898 or for those responsible for Hiroshima. But the Filipinos, like the Armenians, the Greeks, and many other peoples of the Earth did not have professors of “Historical Memory” or celebrants of Holachian Worship.

What was done in Europe after 1945? It was a prolonged action and on several fronts. The installation of hundreds of military bases in a Europe taken as booty was one of the most visible actions. The European armies rebuilt during the post-war period were nothing more than sections of a NATO absolutely controlled from America. With the national flag they could parade and satisfy the national pride of countries that had in fact been broken, emasculated and scrapped. In reality these mini-armies were new sections of the Imperial Army of the West, and such is what they still are. When the Spanish soldiers and their fighters and armoured vehicles of our day, the year 2026, are deployed thousands of kilometres from their homes, in the Baltic or in Central Europe, at the gates of Ukraine or Russia, the message is clear: the indigenous troops of the Empire deserve to enjoy “ERASMUS” stays to win merits and laurels before their benevolent Caesar. The Americans have their foederati and their auxilia, as in Roman times, European natives who do not and will never fight for the interests of their respective homelands but for mere personal promotion or in the pay of an Empire that, if necessary, can sacrifice them, like the rest of the crust of vassalage that has been created since 1945.

These same Spanish soldiers who have been told that Russia is a threat leave the south of the Iberian Peninsula, the Strait of Gibraltar, the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla unguarded. When there is a more than likely Moroccan incursion in such areas, a few civil guards will not be able to stop it. The same Bourbon and the same Zapatero who sold the south of Spain to a corrupt and tyrannical North African country, left southern Europe unguarded. The Yankee Master sends his foederati to the gates of Russia, and his will is law.

The vassalage of Europe from 1945 onwards was achieved, first, by occupying it with military bases and with a huge number of American troops and weapons. It was also carried out through the creation or reconstruction of false national armies, i.e., sections of NATO. The Atlantic organization was behind, as a requirement and as vera effigies of the European economic (and economic-political) institutions: ECSC, EC, EU…

But the palm has been taken by Soft Power. This is exercised through millions of dollars channeled to the purchase of academic and cultural elites, elites that, like political elites, allow themselves to be corrupted partly by pure moral weakness, partly also by survival and growth in the cultural ecosystem, etc. But, I reiterate, it is not the moral weakness, the disease of the corrupt and decadent castes that serves as the main explanatory factor. The cause to which we must point is Power itself, its sources, the state of things that has determined a new asymmetry instead of the previous one. The balance resulting from the defeat of Germany, and the imbalances of “old” powers that fell into the dustbin of history, even nominally triumphing on the Allied side, created this new asymmetry. Britain’s old power (already old since 1914, if not before) confined it to the role of watchdog of the continent, as the sting of an annoying wasp that prevented great Eurasian unions or nationalist whims in France and Germany. The British spies took refuge in the shadows of a larger Western imperial surveillance and dirty war system, almost always alongside the other spies, Jews and Yankees.

The French grandeur had a brief glow and swan song with Gaullism, but the inclination towards the Western Empire and Yankee designs was a process that began to be inexorable. France gave the woke tone  to the entire continent: May 68 was the first flare. From Paris, where young girls were able to wear miniskirts and the “forbidden to prohibit” was proclaimed, the whole monstrosity of gender ideology was built that has served, fundamentally, to prevent there from being enough brave mothers throughout the West of childbearing age and with the fresh and determined spirit of having babies. No hatred of migrants is justified if Europeans lack mothers willing to have babies. The Empire has subdued Europe not with marines and military bases, but with the loudspeakers on gender and woke ideology, which come from the bottom of the most nihilistic and Masonic part of French culture.

From the Parisian monstrosity, taking a walk and shawl through the American campuses, comes the tragic destiny of Europe: that Europe will be left without children and that the site will remain suitable to be occupied by foreigners of the most varied origins, rootless subjects who will inhabit Europe but will no longer be Europeans and will devastate (unintentionally, without a necessary conscious malignancy) their civilization. The death of Europe is its vassalage, not the direct effect of ethnic chaos. Christian and Hebrew Zionism is more civilizingly deadly than an army of imams talking nonsense in European capitals. A healthy Europe would put radicals of all faiths on the border with the ad baculum warning not to think of re-entering. It would be easy But it is the Empire that causes the low birth rate and nihilism, which reaches our fertile females as well as the rest of society. A Yankee-Zionist empire. Paris, with its feminist, homosexualist and deconstructivist philosophers, has been the tomb of Europe’s vitality, castrating scissors. The philosophy (or what is passed off as such) of France, after the glories of Descartes or Bergson, was reduced in the twenty-first century to the condition of contraception. Gender ideology is worse than a chemical castration of our children. This anti-natalist work, and the iron control of Germany under the elegant formula of an “Axis” leader of the European Union, were the Atlanticist achievements of the old France at the service of the Empire.

And now it’s Germany’s turn. This nation is the heart of Europe and, at the same time, the danger to the continent and a danger to itself. The tragedy of Europe, as Jordis von Lohausen taught, is read in precise language by studying the tragedy of Germany. The “half-made” nations of Eastern Europe (Baltics, Slavs, etc.) became European through Teutonic colonization. Saying this may not be “politically correct.” To deny it, on the other hand, is to face reality, to start a fight against History, a fight in which the truth loses. The cruel repatriation of millions of ethnic Germans after 1945, most of them from Russia or Eastern and Baltic countries, and most of them innocent of any Nazi charges, signaled Germany’s ultimate fate. This country, even reunited, received the assignment from Washington: if you control the French and exploit the Mediterranean, you will become great again: you will flex your muscle and your skin will shine beautifully, healthy and rich, but you have to be a eunuch. A strong and beautiful eunuch. The Germans obeyed, they agreed to be the strong and beautiful eunuch.

The eunuch that was the German state for decades now wants to arm himself. The roots of the so-called German Russophobia, so irrational in every respect, are usually explained in psychological terms. A desire for revenge, old hatreds accumulated in the War and in the repression and excesses committed against the defeated… Again, these kinds of explanations are blinding. The pro-European and German elites invoke a disastrous past, plagued by errors and inconsistencies. The Nazis invaded a Russia that would have been their only chance of survival: Eurasian unity. The Nazis provided themselves with economic and energy resources that the Yankee multinationals supported, while sustaining a Yankee army with the intact and almost infinite rearguard that is the great island called America. Hitler was still in the orbit of capitalism. Hitler would have coexisted with the most racist part of the Anglosphere (British and American) without any problem. The Führer was a racist idiot who lacked a Eurasian vision.

The Russophobia and arms fever of the Germans (of their elites) of today has nothing to do with that of yesteryear. The pacifist – and therefore blind and foolish – left of our day wants to present Merz and von der Leyen as the “new Nazis”. But the rearmed German country is integrated into NATO, full of missiles and other terrible weapons of the Americans, including nuclear warheads. Germany is never going to modify alliances in a sovereign direction that is contrary to the Anglosphere, and its strategy of domination of Europe, especially southern Europe, is moving from the manufacturing economy to the war economy. This transfer does not serve to defeat the Russian Federation, a crazy idea that no Teutonic general can think of. Hatred of Russians conceals hatred of a Europe that is always in the potential to break out of its ferrule. The militarisation of state budgets, rather than starting the real war, is what moves these German elites who, in any case and situation, are elites perfectly coordinated with Brussels and Washington on essential issues.

The problem is that a (disingenuous) preparation for war can cause war itself. This is an elemental-level geopolitical truth.

These militaristic but failed elites, after decades of piloting the wealthy eunuch and manufacturer producer, the castrate that was “denazified” Germany, wish to avoid a new and possible Nuremberg, which would be the worst scenario imaginable for them. They want to follow the strategy of pulling forward with error, rather than rectifying and going backwards. As they say in classical Spanish: “defendella y non enmendalla”. Even if the scenario of a new and possible Nuremberg in which we saw Merz, Mrs. Ursula, Borrell, Macron, Rutte, and all the other little characters, especially the dictator Zelensky, not arrive, the discontent of the peoples, linked to a growing anti-Americanism and a fierce weariness and impatience in the face of this cancer of civilization,  the Zionist Entity will only have to grow. It will be logical and inevitable that this should be the case.

Nonetheless, Soft Power will continue to act even when Washington allows its amortized and discredited elites to fall forever. Soft Power is already the owner of a large part of that spectrum that today we identify with the names of “ultra-right” and “populism”. We all remember Steve Bannon’s tour of Europe, until 2020 or so, and his adventure, “The Movement.” To bind the European ultra-rightists and populists to a Yankee-Zionist enterprise is to tame them and control, in advance, any sovereigntist drift born on European soil. The great historical failure of people like Abascal, Meloni, Le Pen, etc. lies in their unquestioned and tenacious submission to the interests of Yankeeism, with which they can never be authentic sovereignists. They will never really connect with “the people”, even if they have demagogically shown their support for the “yellow vests”, the “tractors”, the anti-immigration movements, etc. The best test to which a social movement or a political party can be subjected is that of Atlanticism and Zionism. People who are not willing to break and change the essential geopolitical alliances, leave NATO and break with the Zionist Entity until its deactivation is achieved, are in the opposite camp to that of true sovereignty.

As Raffaele Sciortino argues in an interview the classical Marxist perspective of the class struggle is not dissociable from the geopolitical vision, rather, it is necessary to integrate it here.

The future destabilization of European societies – and, with somewhat different nuances, Ibero-American societies – will create pre-revolutionary situations, motivated by disaffection towards corrupt, authoritarian, warmongering elites despite their rhetoric, enemies of the welfare state. Elites, as the examples of Rodríguez Zapatero or Sánchez testify in Spain, are willing to sell national sovereignty in pieces, even in the most crass territorial aspect. The constant comings and goings of these characters to Morocco, and their obscene prostration before a feudal and corrupt satrap such as the king, are comparable to the fascination that, on the other hand, the leaders of the Spanish and European right feel for that supposed “Sparta” of Judeo-Christianity called Israel. The harsh reality is that the treacherous and corrupt elites serve the Western Empire taken as a bloc, and they willingly allow themselves to be corrupted by these fundamental bishops from the geopolitical point of view, the Moroccan or the Hebrew. Bishops that have nothing to do with the millenary European civilization and rather represent its incompatible antipodes.

The popular rebellion, as the Italian author interviewed says, is in itself a geopolitical element of the first order. The true triumph of multipolarity can only come with the accession of a discontented mass to power, the replacement of corrupt elites with healthier ones, the democratization of sovereign national institutions and the dismantling of the entire superstructure created by the Yankees after their invasion of Europe (on a large scale, in 1944).