The globalist power seeks to maintain its dominance, and aims to dismantle nations-states worldwide, including Ibero-America. Every power has an ideology for legitimating itself. So they claim that a state, if existent, must be a sheer public service provider – that’s why it can be so easily replaced by companies. And, being a service provider maintained by the tax payer’s money, the state must be evaluated just in terms of cost efficiency. The globalist ideology also goes by the name of neoliberalism.
Since the 18th century, the way of undermining complex governments and subjecting them was a combination of privatization and chartered companies (see the East India Company actions in India). During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, chartered companies didn’t need to privatize places of tribal people, such as Congo and Putumayo: they could simply barbarize. Later, in the 1950, they developed the NGOs which govern the environmental parks (see WWF and the size of parks in Namibia). In Africa, the pretext to seize and control large parts of territories were the forests and the wild life.
In the 1990’s, the strategy was replicated to South America, but here the pretexts are the vegetation (not just Amazon) and native tribes.So we can say that the new mechanism introduced to rule Ibero-America are the NGOs. In South America, they replaced their concern with rhinoceros by a concern with native Americans, who shall live in a stone age human zoo. (See the book Green Mafia or Mafia Verde, by Carrasco et al.)
Let us come back to the neoliberal ideology. Instead of having a public and stable board for planning the future of the nation (which includes military spending) and providing public services, the most “efficient” alternative is handing civilian activities over to NGOs and forgetting at all the military budget. In 2001, Bruxelles, the neoliberal Brazilian president Fernando Henrique Cardoso even said to European NGOs that “NGO” stands for neo-governmental organizations, and that they should cooperate with the government in certain issues. (The author of such idea is Manuel Castell, a Spanish sociologist who was a minister in Sanchez government.) The main issues of NGOs’ work didn’t change since then: “preservation” of South-American vegetation and promotion of “human rights”, understood as racial and sexual obsessions (which are now known as wokeism). Conforming to the ESG scheme, the NGOs tend to be either green or woke.
On the privatization side, globalism uses to be interpreted as a right-wing ideology. On the woke side, it uses to be interpreted as a left-wing ideology. However, there is no contradiction on both agendas: things must be privatized in order to be taken by woke and green NGOs. However, this confusion made possible that both right and left wings embraced globalism: a “decolonial” left which denies de right do existence of Ibero-America, claiming that race mixture is rape and theft, and a “libertarian” right who wants to build privatized safe spaces for pseudo-traditionalist communities – a model inspired in evangelical coaches like Bill Gothard.
On the ideological field, the Ibero-America needs to tell again its History of civilization building through peaceful race mixing and universalist faith; and we need to state that we are better civilization than the Calvinism model. We need to have good school curricula and good teacher formation. Furthermore, we need to strengthen again the Catholic church and its Social Teaching. It is also urgent to create a small list of tax exempt churches, because if we copy USA’s laws, we shall have a lot of Tel-Aviv Teds.
