The announcements by Macron’s globalist government to reactivate military service in France are followed by the war psychosis spread, through the media, and the usual propaganda channels, from where they have been preparing the population for this scenario for several years now and creating an information bubble based on the need for a rapid military response to an alleged imminent military threat from Russia.

It is important to remember that the artificial screen, in the form of a political platform, with which Macron came to power was created as a response to Le Pen’s electoral victories: and after that more than questionable victory, among its many promises, Macron’s executive came up with a plan to create a European Union army. 

Where France – the largest military power in Western Europe – would put its nuclear weapons in the form of a deterrent to Russia, while Germany would have the role of being the new land and continental power, without forgetting the role that Poland would play.

This plan was already rejected, at the time, by both Washington and Moscow for more than logical reasons. But we see, now, how it is resurrected under the pretext of a Russian military threat within the Ukrainian conflict; the reality of these plans is that both France and other countries emptied their arms depots during these years of conflict in Ukraine and, now, intend to place large, highly lucrative orders for the political elite and part of the military-industrial complex.

In this case, the French, one of the problems they have is the lack of qualified personnel to operate these new systems since many of them are not even based on the combat experience acquired in Ukraine, which makes it clear that it is a business and not a real need.

Here, lies the other basis of the problem: Western societies, including the French, have been exposed, for decades, to massive social engineering with the aim of diluting the traditional and Catholic social base, for one that is materially conformist and totally alien to the real problems of the nation.

Therefore, to try, now, to recruit the patriotic and native French youth to sacrifice them in some foreign conflict is something more than complicated, above all, because that is precisely the basis on which the state, at the time, already declared war. This base is already politically articulated and is especially contrary to the policies of the Macron government.

Another dimension of the problem is the structure and doctrine of the French army, which, like other NATO armies, went through various types of reforms.  These armies do not have the experience of large-scale mass combat on a broad front such as the Ukrainian; Its experience and doctrine are based on the closure of the airspace of some militarily inferior enemy nation, followed by a massive bombardment and then, with small mobile tactical units, to take control of that territory.

After several reforms, the base of the French army is made up of professional contractors who saw military service as a job opportunity and not as a patriotic call, as a social welfare service since French society suffers from serious problems of social inequality -“ghettization”-, poverty and, generally, it is the least cohesive European society and the one that presents a greater internal division.  with high rates of narcotics consumption among its youth.

It is clear that their youth is also racially and ethnically fragmented where the only thing that unites young people is language; Then there are the gender quotas imposed on homosexuals and women.

In the case of women, the Israeli model is followed where women do compulsory military service, this being a way of uniting the Hebrew nation in patriotism, but that these women do not have the experience in a massive war, especially of attrition where it is biologically proven that the female gender cannot withstand something like this.  with few exceptions. Even less so, French women can bear it for sociological reasons that were discussed above.

In recent decades, a model of negative selection has also been applied to the general staff and generalship, selected microscopically, as a result of their political affiliation and psychological profile, rather than for their qualities and military experience in the field. In this context, the traditionalist and Catholic patriotic line was limited to the rank of colonel and senior officer.

All this makes it clear that the actual number of potential recruits, in the youth of French society, is much lower than that presented on paper and in press reports.

Now, the industrial base still exists and as planned in Germany, by converting the recessive automobile industry into armaments, France can follow this option, but even so the problem will continue to be in the number of personnel to be recruited for a massive war.

Consequently, at this point, the most important thing to note is that, within the French rearmament program, there are still no massive orders for winter thermal uniforms.