The members of the Expert Analytical Association “Sovereignty”, Bruna Frascolla, Raphael Machado, André Santos and Arthur Pavezzi, intervened on the Youtube Channel “Geoforça Brasil” to refer, from their critical perspective, to the historical, political and geopolitical role of the French government of Emanuel Macron, also emphasizing some thorny issues.

Analysts were unanimous in the opinion that, since the Macronist government was an ideological and historical child of the “French Revolution”, it could not serve the sovereign interests of France and, even less, work for the benefit of the people of that nation.
They remarked that the French political class is in a descending situation towards the deplorable, from the point of view of morality and ethics; And, specifically, speaking of the measure to impose drug tests for ministers and government officials, they said that the problem of drug consumption would be present both in the official sphere and in the rest of the political class.

Raphael Machado said that the government presided over by Macron “has a problem with drugs, in addition to having problems with numerous scandals of other kinds”, recalling the scandals over allegations of sexual abuse that linked several Macron officials.

He pointed out that Macron was helped in his access to the pinnacle of French political power by the Rothschild Family – for which he previously worked in the banking system – and that this supranational route facilitated Macron’s access to important international connections that the French president has used since he resides in the Elysee Palace.
He also commented that Jeffrey Epstein’s sex offender claimed to represent the Rothschild Cartel and that Epstein had, among his main recruiters of girls to be destined for abuse, a Frenchman: Jean-Luc Brunel.

André Soares then declared that France with “Macron has reached the peak of absolute decadence” and that the elite that currently manages the French processes “preaches a France completely disconnected from its roots, its traditions, its positive points of reference” and that, on the contrary, the “Artificial France” would be the sum of all destructive individualisms.

In turn, Arthur Pavezzi expressed his vision by arguing that, in Official France, there is a permanent spectacle and that “A political class so addicted to illicit substances is a danger to sovereignty” and that this also explains, in part, the painful situation that the French people live every day.  who are affected, among other damages, by the “constant cuts in workers’ rights” and who, in this atmosphere of anti-tradition and emptiness of transcendence, many French people “only have to take drugs and get high”.

For her part, Bruna Frascolla indicated how unfortunate the relationship between Lula da Silva and Emanuel Macron turned out to be for Brazil and that the multimillion-dollar investments that Macron had announced for Brazil did not materialize in any way.

Therefore, “this romance between Lula and Macron, it seems that only the youngest and thinnest boy – in references to the person of Macron – was victorious in this story” because Brazil had effective restrictions on its environmental policy, affecting the development of its economy in general, to the benefit of Macron.

To conclude, we mention that, in their conversation, the members of this Think Tank were accompanied by a guest: Cesar Vincenzo.
Vincenzo conveyed his skepticism about the honesty and viability of the French government’s move to implement drug tests on its ministers and other officials. “It is probably more of a symbolic measure,” and that the intention was primarily to improve the government’s image, “to calm the population and ensure no one thinks we are being coordinated by a group of drug addicts,” he said clearly.