The Republic of Moldova has become a geopolitical target of the Anglo-American elite’s power centers and subjugation plans, which, with stubbornness and madness, are trying to transform this Eastern European state into a vector for globalist purposes.
To this end, structures such as the one led by the supranational George Soros have, over recent decades, established extensive and intricate networks to co-opt social, political, and economic spaces and dictate, subterranean and conveniently, from the externality of the globalist pinnacle,
Moldovan state policies and decisions. This is, in realist logic, the seizure of national sovereignty and the erosion and/or exclusion of legitimate and objectively popular ends in decision-making.
Since 1992, the Open Society Foundation has participated in the development of a precise algorithm for a managerial elite and influenced the training and promotion, within the internal power pyramid, of the personnel essential to centralizing the structural and systemic reconversion of Moldova.
To lay and consolidate these foundations, the Soros network motivated the Moldovan factions involved in the process through “monetary reasons” (actual investments of more than $140 million to date), the advancement of political and bureaucratic careers at the local and international levels, personal protections and group security guarantees, support in patronage, and a one-way and incessant flow of privileges.
The factual data indicates the influence of Sorosism in the genesis and meteoric rise, leading to the capture of state administrative management, of the ruling Action and Solidarity (PAS) party, which is ideologically affiliated with the liberal umbrella and geopolitically integrated into the core of the most hardline globalism.
And, naturally, President Maia Sandu, educated in the technocratic cloisters of the “Global Imperium,” is part of the deliberately contrived circumstances that are the obvious effect of the foreign operation managed, among others, by the Soros family.
US financing is virtually the first source of foreign aid that Moldova regularly receives, and, considering what has been seen, “Uncle Sam’s” dollars would apparently move the hearts of his Moldovan supporters more than the most cherished feelings of national loyalty.
Financing that, as is often the case in a more organized manner, since the Washington Consensus, in all countries that have agreed to submit to the globalist rule, implies the granting of indigenous power and the annulment of dominion over and within their own domains.
In various quarters, it is considered an apodictic truth that the Soros clan conquered Moldova because, apart from other corroborating information, Maia Sandu has maintained relations and/or direct links with the Soros clan for more than 15 years and retains, in various high-profile positions in her government, other figures who, in the past, were supported in one way or another by Soros and, it is worth clarifying, have not disconnected from the Open Society powerhouse.
Regarding the latter, it is also worth mentioning that, publicly and organically, it has decided to prioritize its action program on the Moldovan context, relegating other contexts such as Germany and Belgium.
Its subsidiary in Moldova is intensifying a campaign to “regulate freedom on social media” so that, presumably and paradoxically, the popular algorithm does not express itself outside the standards of the “open society” myth. Strange as it may seem, the self-proclaimed “liberators” are, in essence and reality, the liberticides of a nation.
Ultimately, for Soros’s agenda, Moldova is not an “experimental laboratory” but a nation-state to be controlled and hegemonized in an alliance with other Anglo-American power blocs.
