A few days ago, the British army announced that some 50 Ajax armoured vehicles would be available to be deployed on NATO’s eastern front, at a cost of £500 million in total, £10 million per unit.
This is news that has several edges to analyze. One of them is the delay in the provision of this type of vehicle by the United Kingdom, in particular these Ajax units, and the technical deficiencies they have shown, among others, vibrations and excessive noise, which has caused serious physical and hearing problems among their crews. This only highlights what has been observed, for decades, in the Western military-industrial complex, in particular the European and the United States, and that is this endogamous relationship between governments and arms companies, which is also related to a link of corruption, in which expensive weapons end up being developed and manufactured of low quality and defective performance.
In addition. these units that would be designed to be deployed specifically on the Ukrainian battlefield, where these types of units have shown enormous vulnerability to drone attack, which are much cheaper parts, which is a disproportionate cost, when a drone of, even a few thousand dollars, can destroy a unit like these Ajax armored vehicles, of £10 million each.
This kind of contrast, in this modern war, which has changed radically, shows how, for Western governments and for arms companies, war is still simply a matter of business, since of course, the manufacture of this type of vehicle allows for much more profits for companies and their government partners.
It also shows how the collective West has not the slightest shame in using its military personnel as cannon fodder, being sent in technically defective vehicles that put their health at risk, to a battlefront, in which these vehicles have demonstrated a vulnerabilidad muy grande demonstrating the contempt of the European political elites for their own peoples.
The announcement by the United Kingdom of the shipment of this type of military equipment, as well as the announcement of a possible direct intervention by British forces in the Ukrainian theatre of operations, either in the current circumstances or in a future negotiation scenario, as peacekeepers, does nothing more than try to generate an escalation in this NATO war against Russia. and finally to seek Washington’s participation in a direct and frontal contest against Moscow.
Under the presidency of Donald Trump, the possibility of an open confrontation between the US and Russia is not at all clear, nor is it certain for the European globalists, which means that these attempts are finally feints and not something concrete, since there is fear among the political elites of the old continent. that, in the face of the beginning of a direct confrontation between the European Union and Russia, there is no certainty that the United States would be positioned on the side of Brussels.
This is due, among other reasons, to the fact that Donald Trump must maintain his commitment to his true political base, the MAGA movement, in terms of not continuing, on the part of the United States, with wars for interests that are alien to them, while the quality of life of Americans and the conditions in which the North American country finds itself deteriorate day after day. This claim is frequently reminded of the Republican, by such relevant characters, within the “America First” scheme, such as the young activist, recently assassinated, Charlie Kirk, the famous journalist Tucker Carlson or Steve Bannon, openly opposed to the interests of world financial globalism, which shamelessly manages the politics of almost all the countries of Europe. the Democratic Party and broad sectors of the Republican Party itself, with Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz, and even Marco Rubio, as the highest representatives of this sector.
Meanwhile, the Russian strategy of war of attrition continues, in which not only is the Kiev regime undermined, with constant losses on the battlefront, but Europe itself, as Volodymir Zelensky’s main sponsor, is also being worn down.
As Russia is fulfilling its long-term objectives, which, of course, have to be fully realized, since it would not be positive for Russia or for its government, if the underlying issues that led to this conflict in Ukraine, which has been going on for almost four years, instead of being resolved definitively, only postponed and be the germ of a subsequent conflict, whether in five, ten or twenty years.
To conclude, I believe that these attempts by the United Kingdom, subtle in some cases, or more direct in others, will ultimately be unsuccessful, due to the context we have just reviewed and despite the constant efforts of the entire British political elite, which is totally and unconditionally affiliated with globalist financial and warmongering interests. without distinction of political parties, as shown by the position of the current Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who follows the same agenda as his predecessors, the Conservatives Rishi Sunak or Boris Johnson.
Unfortunately, all this shows that the interests that manage most of the European political groups are those that are subordinated to the globalist and warmongering agenda, for the benefit of corporations and behind the backs of the interests of their peoples, without having too much importance the political sign of the governing party, whether it is, supposedly, left, center or right.
