On 3 January 2026, yet another imperialist attack was carried out by Washington’s “corsairs” against the legitimately elected president of a country not aligned with the wishes of the deep state that governs the North American plutocracy across both the Republican and Democratic parties. Operation “Absolute Resolve”, in which Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were abducted after their personal Cuban escort and several hundred civilians were murdered in cold-blooded bombings, should not be interpreted simply as yet another violation of international law, which for years has been reduced to a mere cliché and stereotype to be fed to the masses tamed by the single mindset manufactured by the system’s press, but an open declaration of war on the multipolar world by the Zionist-Atlanticist axis.

It is irrelevant to dwell on the non-compliance with international norms, given that in the system of public international law, the primary sources are customs whose binding nature is based on the will of the entire international community.

International custom means consistent and uniform behaviour by most subjects of international law, accompanied by the perception that such conduct is legally binding.

In short, it is a mere tacit agreement between the diplomatic chancelleries of different countries, which inevitably sees these “rules of the game” bent to the geopolitical needs and economic interests of countries that have superpower status or place themselves above any international body: the United States and Israel are the countries that have most violated and contributed to the dismantling of the system of humanitarian and war law established after the end of the Second World War following the establishment of the International Tribunals in Tokyo and Nuremberg.

Even the kidnapping of a leader of a sovereign country by foreign military forces is not unique in the history of international relations, given that the United States has already exercised a sort of extraterritorial jurisdiction, always hypocritically cloaked in legal doctrines created ad hoc to satisfy its sinister and vile economic interests. The invasion of Panama in 1989, under the administration of President Bush, with thousands of deaths to arrest the president and former CIA collaborator Manuel Noriega, accused like Maduro of drug trafficking, is a magnificent example of this. Unfortunately, it was never proven that Noriega had trafficked drugs, but instead he paid Nicaraguan paramilitaries (para-fascist organisations) in the pay of “Uncle Sam” to destabilise the revolutionary Sandinista government in Nicaragua, and the dollars for this operation came from the Colombian cartels in Medellin. The Iran-Contra scandal during the Reagan administration

Reagan administration showed that the United States itself was selling arms to Iran, a country it had hit with a heavy embargo during the war against another long-time CIA collaborator, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, which was then eliminated decades later. The cocaine money was used to destabilise Central American countries and even led to a conviction by the International Criminal Court (Nicaragua Transborder Army Case) against the United States, which was officially recognised by an international body as a country supporting terrorists. The entire operation was conceived by Klaus Barbie, the Nazi criminal who lived in Bolivia and collaborated with US intelligence under the pseudonym Klaus Altman. The other striking case was the kidnapping of Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 2004, who strongly opposed the transformation of his island into a drug hub to finance US illicit operations. US special forces kidnapped him and handed him over to the French secret services, who, with the approval of Interior Minister Dominique de Villepin, deported him to the Central African Republic.

Compared to the previous crimes of the “Hamburger Monarchy”, what characterises the “Caracas Rat”? Paradoxically, the incursion into Caribbean territory expresses the desperation of the US ruling apparatus, which is trying to delay the inevitable collapse of a declining empire characterised by an extremely fractured society on the brink of civil war. The real picture of the stars and stripes thalassocracy, deliberately concealed by the mass media controlled by large Zionist families, is that of a country with a public debt of $38 billion and unpayable interest amounting to $650 billion per year. This “papier-mâché democracy”, governed in tandem by private multinationals and the armed military class of the Pentagon, has been on the verge of bankruptcy or default for the last three consecutive years, is afflicted by extremely high unemployment and poverty that has engulfed the middle class, and its existence is intrinsically linked to the use of the dollar as the currency of international trade. The exclusive use of the greenback, emblazoned with the Masonic ‘All-Seeing Eye,’ in international markets is the last bastion of the unipolar supremacy of a state led by private corporations.

And now we return to Bolivarian lands, and leaving aside the numerous mistakes made by the Maduro administration, from its lack of charisma to the system of nepotism and corruption that afflicted the country, we examine the “sins” of sovereignty that condemned those who dared to oppose the “two-faced Janus” of Washington-Tel Aviv to exemplary punishment.

The confrontation between the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which had previously been under the fifty-year control of Exxon Mobile and the Rockefellers and was an extension of the backyard of its cumbersome northern neighbour, and the Anglo-Zionist plutocracy began in 2007 when Commander Chavez expropriated the assets of oil companies that opposed revising their shareholdings with the state and transferred control to the national company PDVS. The ideological rifts continue to widen, despite the fact that the two countries continue to trade in crude oil, but the “act of lese majesty” is consummated during the Maduro government, when, in response to the Yankees’ unjustified and unilateral sanctions, Caracas’ foreign policy threatens to end the petrodollar system that has kept America as the dominant economic power for 50 years.

Venezuela has 303 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. The largest on Earth. More than Saudi Arabia. 20% of the world’s entire oil supply. The South American country actively sold that oil in Chinese yuan, not dollars. In 2018, Venezuela announced that it would ‘free itself from the dollar’. They started accepting yuan, euros, roubles, anything but dollars for oil. They submitted a petition to join the BRICS (rejected by Brazil’s ambiguous Lula da Silva, a former trade unionist president who went from defending workers’ rights to defending LGTBQ minorities and Soros-style indigenism). They were creating direct payment channels with China that completely bypassed SWIFT. And for decades, they had enough oil to finance de-dollarisation. This foreign policy position was the greatest heresy for the Wall Street banking mafia, as the entire American financial system is based on a single axiom: the petrodollar. In 1974, Henry Kissinger struck a deal with Saudi Arabia: all oil sold globally must be priced in US dollars. In return, America provides military protection. This single agreement created artificial demand for dollars around the world. Every country on Earth needs dollars to buy oil. This allows America to print unlimited money while other countries work to obtain it. It finances the military, the welfare state, and deficit spending. For US hegemony, the petrodollar is more important than aircraft carriers, as it is the last bastion before the impending implosion.

Another affront, this time to the City of London, took place in 2019 when President Nicolas Maduro requested the repatriation of 31 tonnes of gold bullion deposited in the vaults of the Bank of England. Immediately after the request, made by the Venezuelan delegation composed of the then Minister of Finance, the United Kingdom hastened to recognise the self-proclaimed puppet President Juan Guaidò, denying the return of the gold to the South American people. Not even the outbreak of the COVID pandemic has stopped the cynicism of the British government, which has again refused to return the gold and even to sell it and deposit the cash needed to tackle the health crisis in an account managed by the United Nations. To this day, a sum of $4 billion remains expropriated sine dia from Venezuela, which has seen virtually 30% of its gold reserves illegally seized by the government of His Majesty Charles III Winsor. Since 29 July 2022, the High Court in London has repeatedly rejected all requests from Caracas, and this illegitimate position constitutes outright theft, destroying any remaining confidence in Europe’s largest stock exchange.

In addition to these two reasons, there are many others, including: anti-Zionism and the close multipolar cooperation established at least fifteen years ago between the Plurinational Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Both Chávez and his “heir apparent” and successor Maduro have never shied away from denouncing the crimes of the Zionist entity, have fully and legitimately supported the claims of the Palestinian people, and have shown an incredible and magnificent example of South-South cooperation between two key oil hubs. Furthermore, this mutually beneficial cooperation was also based on the exchange of civil-military technology. The opening up to the Iranian Pasdaran or Hezbollah militants in the heart of the South American continent could only set off alarm bells for the United States, dominated by the Zionist lobby AIPAC. With many countries in the area sliding towards blatantly pro-Zionist positions, such as Milei’s Argentina or Santiago Pena’s Paraguay, this Persian-Venezuelan collaboration had to be crushed by any means necessary.

A revisiting of the Monroe Doctrine 2.0 in Trumpian sauce, redefined in a megalomaniacal Donroe way, or something else? Analysis of the latest international events, which are unfolding at a frenetic pace, suggests something very different from a simple division of spheres of influence, a sort of New Yalta 2.0 or, as suggested by some analysts, a G4 that would include Russia, China, India and, indeed, the Zionist-tinged Thalassocracy. This is an open attack on the BRICS system, which, despite the formal facade between Putin and Trump, the foreign policy of Neo-Con Marco Rubio aims to expel the Chinese and Russians from the Western hemisphere, appropriate the rare earths necessary to maintain military superiority in order to curb the rise of a polycentric world and finally reclaim the strategic points of trade routes.

Starting in order, the US blitz in Venezuela sent a clear message to China: the US wants to gradually regain total control of Latin America. By fair means or, if necessary, by foul. Indeed, the US now has its sights set on several countries in the region that are not aligned with the tycoon’s line – such as Mexico, Colombia and Ecuador – the very same countries that have welcomed millions and millions of Chinese investments in recent years.

Amid general silence and widespread indifference, the old US “backyard” has been flooded with yuan and Beijing’s influence has grown visibly. But what has the Asian giant managed to achieve? The list is particularly long and includes the construction of strategic infrastructure, such as ports and roads, as well as the exploitation of mines rich in strategic minerals and cooperation between Chinese companies and regional players in the energy and space sectors. The spearhead of China’s presence in Latin America is the port of Chancay, located about 60 kilometres north of Lima, Peru. The project, 60% controlled by shipping giant China Cosco Shipping (Cosco) and 40% by Peruvian partners, required a total investment of approximately $3.5–3.6 billion, with a significant portion financed by capital from beyond the Great Wall. The port, which will be operational by the end of 2024, is a kind of logistics hub capable of connecting the entire region to East Asia by sea via the Pacific Ocean. In more general terms, we can also mention the production of electric vehicles, car parts and batteries in Mexico and Brazil, solar parks in Argentina and Chile, urban infrastructure (the metros in Bogotá and Monterrey), dams, while among the more specific projects, it is worth mentioning Huawei’s 5G City in the Brazilian city of Curitiba and the Espacio Lejano space communications station in Patagonia.

Between 2000 and 2018, China invested $73 billion in the raw materials sector, as well as in the construction of refineries and processing plants in countries with significant quantities of coal, copper, natural gas, oil and uranium. More recently, Beijing has focused on lithium production in the so-called Lithium Triangle States: Argentina, Bolivia and Chile (the triad contains about half of the world’s lithium).

In 2000, the Chinese market absorbed less than 2% of Latin American exports, but over the next eight years, trade grew at an average annual rate of 31%. By 2021, the value of bilateral trade had exceeded £450 billion, reaching a record £518 billion in 2024.

Meanwhile, China is South America’s main trading partner and the second largest in Latin America as a whole. In May 2025, Beijing even hosted a summit with regional leaders, during which President Xi Jinping announced a £9 billion credit line for investment in the region. The new advance by the US in its “backyard” will presumably force the Dragon to review its calculations. The Asian giant will not abandon the region but will act with much more caution. According to the Wall Street Journal, Beijing will no longer aim to make new progress in Latin America, at least in the short term.

Added to this is the recent ban on the export of rare earths by the “Celestial Empire”, especially to its main US competitors. This measure seriously jeopardises the entire supply chain of the civil and, above all, military industry, which keeps the derelict former British colony afloat, destroyed internally by the woke policies of Obama and Biden. To deal with this disastrous situation, multinationals and the “deep state” have placed their trusted man in a strategic position. Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban exiles with deep connections to the Miami underworld, light years away from Trump’s MAGA base, is in charge of primary predatory operations. And since much of North America’s public debt is held by China and numerous US companies manufacture in the Asian country, an open commercial or military confrontation would be suicidal.

The assault on Venezuela and the threats to Greenland, of acquisition and/or occupation to the detriment of Copenhagen, are part of the strategy to recover the precious lands that both states are rich in. And if bauxite or coltan, as well as Venezuela’s gold, are claimed by the Rothschild family, who have publicly expressed their jubilation at the dethronement of President Maduro on social media, Greenland must become the 52nd state of the Empire to save it from destruction. The largest island in the world possesses 13% of the world’s oil, 30% of its gas, zinc, lead, uranium, nickel, graphite and, above all, 8% of the planet’s freshwater reserves, which will be needed in the near future to cool the quantum computers of artificial intelligence.

If we add to this the fact that the thaw is favouring the opening of Arctic routes, which have become faster and more reliable than the traditional routes from Asia through the Strait of Malacca, where piracy is rife, and then the Gulf of Aden and the Strait of Bab el Mandel, which is under attack from the Houthis, takes almost three weeks to reach Europe, we can understand Washington’s primordial interest, which currently controls only Alaska and is far behind its Sino-Russian competitors. At the top of this hypothetical trade triangle is Iran, which is repeatedly targeted and destabilised, given its strategic position and wealth of national crude oil. And while the Marines intervene in Greenland and Venezuela, Israel’s Siamese twin is tasked with acting as the armed wing in the region against the Persian state. Given that most of the US software that controls artificial intelligence, as well as Silicon Valley multinationals, is managed by ultra-Zionist companies, the interest in eliminating two crucial allies of China that supply it with large quantities of oil, namely Venezuela and Iran, and appropriating these checkpoints on global trade routes, becomes an undisguised obsession.

The Tel Aviv dictatorship, with its latest diplomatic moves, has openly confirmed its plan for exclusive control of global trade routes: the recognition of Somaliland and the occupation of some islands in the Socotra Archipelago express this pincer action aimed at strangling the BRICS’ logistical framework. Despite the facade of diplomacy, there is talk of the spirit of Anchorage between the Russian Federation and the United States of America. The latter, in concert with its Zionist offshoot in the Middle East, has launched an open war against all the key allies of the Sino-Russian-led multipolar project, while at the same time continuing to supply weapons and military instructors to both Taiwan and Ukraine, led by the narco-dictator Zelensky.

The globe is ablaze on all geopolitical fronts, and only a clear and firm response from the Beijing-Moscow duo can prevent, in the short to medium term, the outbreak of open conflict with US leaders who stubbornly refuse to accept the end of unipolarity and are ready to lead humanity to the brink of nuclear disaster.