Carlos Mamani Aliaga and Renan Guevara, specialists who are part of the Association “Sovereignty” spoke on the “Diego In the Struggle” Channel about the institutional dynamics of our center of thought and geopolitical information and other global complexities.

Mamani Aliaga underlined the sovereigntist and multipolar profile of the Expert Analytical Association “Sovereignty”, which is based in the Federative Republic of Brazil.

The speaker pointed out that this Think Tank is present on five continents and that, due to its nature as an “alternative space”, it is experiencing growth where the members are free-thinking and sovereignist. In his opinion, the Expert Analytical Association’s intellectual production axis “Sovereignty” focuses on the multifaceted and multidimensional reality of the 21st century and is not anchored in the dichotomies and clichés of the 20th century.

Asked by the host of the program about some international issues that are of maximum global concern, Mamani Aliaga said that there is a mistake that is present in a significant number of analysts that consists of disconnecting the war process from politics itself. For this expert, the phenomenon of war emanates from a political question and concludes basally when political solutions are found to the causes that generated a particular war.

He believes that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization has “no great future” ahead of it and encourages Europe to leave behind the status of being an “occupied continent” and return to a sensible historical path.

Meanwhile, Renan Guevara reflected on the mistake made by many analysts, academics and political and military leaders of the West, who believed in the myth of the “End of History”, a fiction that was promoted, as is known, by Francis Fukuyama and other think tanks.

But the world, including those same people who believed in the ultimate supremacist delusion of globalist liberalism, later realized that geopolitical unipolarism did not fit as dominant in the world reality.
Guevara also elaborated on the clash between the U.S. and European elites for the future control of Greenland, especially when the United States would be accepting that it cannot defeat, in a direct war, China; therefore, it looks to Europe to weaken it even more and strip it of more of its own assets.

As a not minor detail, it can be mentioned that the host of the program highlighted that the audience of the cycle followed with interest the statements that, live and direct, were made by the experts of Expert Analytical Association “Sovereignty”.