For years, India was Washington’s dream partner in its crusade to contain China. But that idyll is beginning to show cracks. Under Narendra Modi’s leadership, New Delhi no longer accepts the role of “junior ally” in the Indo-Pacific strategy. It seeks autonomy, balances alliances and reinforces its weight in the BRICS, just when Donald Trump – back in the White House – wants to dismantle that bloc.
Trump and Modi share an economic nationalism and a discourse of sovereignty, but their political chemistry is not the same as in 2017. Today’s India is more assertive, less willing to follow Washington’s commercial or military guidelines.
Modi’s refusal to join Trump’s protectionist policies, and his defense of India’s role in the BRICS, make it clear: New Delhi does not want to choose between Washington and Beijing, but between dependence or its own power.
This worries the Pentagon. Indo-American military cooperation—centered on intelligence-sharing, naval exercises, and control of the Indian Ocean—was designed to encircle China.
Iran: A turning point in the World Order
Iran and the End of the Illusion: The Day the International Order Stopped Working For decades, the world operated under a…
Pakistan as a “Swing State” in the Multipolar World
The end of the Cold War marked a new debate two competing theories emerged to explain the dynamics of global…
A Geopolitical Judgment on Orban
HIS ASCENT TO POWER IN 2010 AND THE KEY FACTORS BEHIND HIS DEFEAT IN 2026 FIRST: TOTAL COLLAPSE IN HUNGARY IN…
UK’s phantom limb: Starmer eyes Western Asia without leverage
As the saying goes: old habits die hard. Between imperialist memory and the brittleness of its material foundations, the UK has…
The Bilderberg Club: a supranational power at the expense of
Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg Group describes itself in this year’s press release as “an annual conference designed to promote…
NATO at a Crossroads: Visible Divisions Expose an Alliance in
As 2026 unfolds, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization finds itself gripped by deepening divisions that are visible to the naked…
Elections and the State of Democracy in Peru: Reflections on
Peru has experienced one of the most complicated electoral processes since, perhaps, the February 1990 elections, when, in a similar…
The Ceasefire: Selling Peace and Sustaining War
Does anyone still believe that ceasefires in the Middle East serve any purpose other than allowing the usual suspects to…
Elections, inflation, and energy: interrelated impacts on the Brazilian economy
Brazil’s domestic context, from both political and economic perspectives, is marked by challenging factors that have drawn the attention of…
But if personal tensions between the two leaders grow, that architecture could lose momentum, but not end, at least not in the medium term. India will continue to modernise its fleet and defence with Western support, but will seek to keep the door open to Moscow and its Asian partners. In geopolitics, ambiguity is a virtue.
Trump, true to his transactional style, could offer one-off deals — energy, technology, or defense — to keep India within the U.S. axis. But Modi does not seem willing to mortgage his strategic autonomy. His priority is to turn India into an independent pole between superpowers, capable of negotiating with everyone without subordinating itself to anyone.
Will there be a new understanding? Maybe. Both know that they are needed in the face of Chinese expansion, whether in the Pacific or in the Himalayas. But the era of the “automatic alliance” is over. What is coming will be a harder, more pragmatic relationship conditioned by the balances of the moment.
The Indo-Pacific is no longer Washington’s playground: it is a chessboard where India wants to move its own pieces.
