For more than three decades, Colombia and the United States built a strategic alliance that set the tone for hemispheric cooperation in Latin America. Forged in the context of the fight against drug trafficking, institutional strengthening, and bilateral trade, this relationship was seen as a model of stability and shared responsibility.
However, that era appears to be coming to an end. Today, more than a strategic relationship, what is projected is a tense, ideologically driven, and fracturing partnership, marked by a deep political disagreement between the administration of President Gustavo Petro and the US government. This crisis did not emerge overnight.
It is the result of a series of accumulated frictions that have weakened the foundations of one of the continent’s strongest alliances. Cooperation between Colombia and the United States was consolidated with Plan Colombia (1999-2000), through which Washington allocated millions of dollars in military and economic aid to combat cartels and insurgencies.
Under governments such as Álvaro Uribe and George W. Bush, this alliance reached its peak, with an agreement even being signed to allow US troops access to Colombian military bases in 2009. With the arrival of Juan Manuel Santos and Barack Obama’s support for the Peace Agreement in 2016, the focus shifted toward post-conflict.
Who is harnessing france’s anger?
Parties, foreign networks, organised rioters, the State: everyone is seizing the movement, no one is answering it. Some kinds of anger…
France between chaos and flames
1. Introduction: The Dantesque Scenario as a Diagnostic Moment On 17–18 October 2026, France experienced what foreign observers immediately recognised as…
The student factor and the massive social protests in the
To understand what is happening, it is enough to make a simple political reasoning. 2027 represents a crucial electoral appointment for…
The decisive moment in the war of Ukraine is approaching
We have become accustomed to analysing the war in Ukraine through the prism of ground battles, calculating gains in square…
EU budget dispute sharpens
Brussels is experiencing its most uncertain hours since the creation of the European project. The negotiations to define the 2028-2034…
Student protests, Marine Le Pen and the decline of the
The student mobilization in France, which began on September 17 at the Saint-Exupéry de Créteil high school, located on the…
Food Crisis in 2027? From Diesel to the Dinner Table
A food crisis can begin far from the fields: at an attacked refinery, with a delayed fertilizer shipment, or along…
The UK is at risk of running out of gas
Clearly, the United Kingdom is going through a systemic crisis that is becoming deep and, according to the available evidence,…
NATO fireworks
As in previous years, for ten days, starting on October 13, this time with Italy as the host country, NATO…
However, in 2015, Colombia suspended aerial spraying with glyphosate, one of Washington’s key tools in crop eradication, triggering the first warnings.
Under Iván Duque, Colombia attempted to stay in step with Donald Trump, especially in its stance against the regimes of Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Even so, anti-drug cooperation began to show signs of fatigue. In 2020, for the first time in nearly three decades, the United States dismissed Colombia as a reliable partner in the fight against drugs, citing the record increase in coca cultivation.
The election of Gustavo Petro in 2022 marked a turning point. The first leftist president in Colombian history, he came to power with the intention of breaking with the historical subordination to Washington. His anti-drug strategy abandoned a punitive and militarized logic, opting instead for a focus on public health, rural development, and social justice.
This shift was met with skepticism in the United States. Despite attempts at dialogue, such as the meeting between Petro and Biden in April 2023, the rift deepened. On the military front, Petro refused to collaborate in the war in Ukraine, refused to send weapons to Washington, and announced the end of US arms purchases, opting for self-sufficiency. Meanwhile, China emerged as a key new player. In October 2023, Petro traveled to Beijing to elevate relations with Xi Jinping to the level of “strategic partners.” In 2024, Colombia formally joined the Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2025, it joined the BRICS Development Bank.
Finally, in September 2025, the United States again announced the desertification of Colombia, deepening the rift. Petro responded harshly, calling the decision “rude” and recalling Colombia’s sacrifice in human lives. Given this scenario, one wonders whether relations between Colombia and the United States will be definitively severed. Everything indicates no… at least not immediately. Commercial interdependence and active diplomatic channels still guarantee a minimum of stability.
However, the strategic alliance as we knew it no longer exists. We are facing a new era of pragmatic, casual relations without structural trust. Colombia is paving the way for strategic diversification.
The relationship with Beijing extends beyond the economic sphere. Even so, it poses obvious risks as the country is undergoing a pivotal moment in its foreign policy. A commitment to a more sovereign diplomacy could represent a historic opportunity to redefine its role in the international order. But it also poses enormous challenges: the risk of isolation, the weakening of key alliances, and dependence on powers with foreign interests.
In this context of geopolitical reconfiguration, where the world order is moving toward a multipolar logic, the room for maneuver is narrowing and strategic prudence becomes indispensable. The future of the relationship with the United States, the rapprochement with China, and regional autonomy will ultimately depend on the Colombian state’s ability to make firm decisions without losing its institutional anchorage or its democratic horizon.
