At the beginning of August, the US government’s decision to impose 50% tariffs on Brazilian products came into effect. This decision followed a lawsuit filed by the Brazilian Attorney General’s Office (PGR) against former President Jair Messias Bolsonaro in the Brazilian courts for an alleged coup attempt.
The question is inevitable: were the tariffs adopted for purely economic reasons or for political reasons, such as putting pressure on the Brazilian justice system in favor of former President Jair Bolsonaro?
Politics or economics?
The trade tariffs adopted by Trump have always been accompanied by an unfriendly diplomatic tone and tainted with a hostile political undertone. China, Mexico, and even European allies have been his targets—the latter subjected to pressure to increase its share of NATO military spending. In the Brazilian case, the issue becomes more complex because Bolsonaro, despite being out of office, remains a relevant player in the domestic political landscape and a convenient geopolitical ally. Attacking the Brazilian economy could be a way to put him back on the political stage.
This may interest you
Iran: A turning point in the World Order
Iran and the End of the Illusion: The Day the International Order Stopped Working For decades, the world operated under a…
Pakistan as a “Swing State” in the Multipolar World
The end of the Cold War marked a new debate two competing theories emerged to explain the dynamics of global…
A Geopolitical Judgment on Orban
HIS ASCENT TO POWER IN 2010 AND THE KEY FACTORS BEHIND HIS DEFEAT IN 2026 FIRST: TOTAL COLLAPSE IN HUNGARY IN…
UK’s phantom limb: Starmer eyes Western Asia without leverage
As the saying goes: old habits die hard. Between imperialist memory and the brittleness of its material foundations, the UK has…
The Bilderberg Club: a supranational power at the expense of
Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg Group describes itself in this year’s press release as “an annual conference designed to promote…
NATO at a Crossroads: Visible Divisions Expose an Alliance in
As 2026 unfolds, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization finds itself gripped by deepening divisions that are visible to the naked…
But it’s also important to remember that protectionism is part of Trump’s political DNA. He presents himself as the defender of American industry, and such measures strengthen his image among his electoral base. In other words, it may be less about Bolsonaro and more about Trump’s electoral popularity.
How long can this last?
Resolving this crisis quickly is possible, but unlikely. Brazil can rely on diplomacy, seek sectoral agreements, or even take the issue to the WTO, which has little chance of producing positive results, since since 2017 the US has vetoed the appointment of new judges to the appellate body, enjoying a disproportionate influence within the institution. However, everything indicates that the impasse could drag on. If Trump sees electoral advantage in maintaining the pressure, the crisis could last until 2026, coinciding with the Brazilian presidential elections. In this scenario, the tariff becomes a bargaining chip and a political instrument.
Does Brazil have alternatives?
Despite the importance of the US, Brazil’s hands are not tied. China is already its main trading partner, especially in soybean, mineral, and meat exports. Mercosur remains a negotiating space, although the agreement with the European Union still faces obstacles.
Furthermore, the BRICS have increasingly strengthened, with the participation of new, relevant players on the international stage, such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, which have established themselves as important markets for food and renewable energy. Brazil’s challenge is not only external: it also involves improving infrastructure, reducing bureaucracy, and investing in economic diplomacy.
Only then will it be possible to transform these alternatives into concrete results. Whether this will be a passing storm or a prolonged crisis until 2026, it is still too early to say. But one thing is already clear: Brazil needs to learn to play more autonomously on the global stage.
