For more than three decades, Colombia and the United States built a strategic alliance that set the tone for hemispheric cooperation in Latin America. Forged in the context of the fight against drug trafficking, institutional strengthening, and bilateral trade, this relationship was seen as a model of stability and shared responsibility.
However, that era appears to be coming to an end. Today, more than a strategic relationship, what is projected is a tense, ideologically driven, and fracturing partnership, marked by a deep political disagreement between the administration of President Gustavo Petro and the US government. This crisis did not emerge overnight.
It is the result of a series of accumulated frictions that have weakened the foundations of one of the continent’s strongest alliances. Cooperation between Colombia and the United States was consolidated with Plan Colombia (1999-2000), through which Washington allocated millions of dollars in military and economic aid to combat cartels and insurgencies.
Under governments such as Álvaro Uribe and George W. Bush, this alliance reached its peak, with an agreement even being signed to allow US troops access to Colombian military bases in 2009. With the arrival of Juan Manuel Santos and Barack Obama’s support for the Peace Agreement in 2016, the focus shifted toward post-conflict.
Europe under strain: rearmament, dependence and hybrid warfare
For quite some time now, we have been talking about a “hybrid war” that Russia is allegedly waging against Europe….
The AfD’s triumph and Merz’s collapse
On Sunday, September 6, 2026, 1.7 million eligible voters were called to renew the regional parliament (Landtag) of the state…
Expert of the Association “Sovereignty” on France 24
The international television channel, France 24, invited one of our experts, Gonzalo Collado De Giovannini, to present his perspective on…
How much geopolitics has to do with the chronic insecurity
Without a correct geopolitical and socio-political orientation-approach, the fight against insecurity and organized crime does not exist, it is in…
Iceland’s popular sovereigntists reject the EU
On 29 August, Iceland said NO to the European Union (EU): in the referendum, 52.8% of voters rejected a return…
Fear of the East – the German establishment’s concern about
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is polling 40-42 per cent in Saxony-Anhalt ahead of the East German state’s Landtag election…
What is happening in Ceuta at a strategic level?
On July 30, 70,000 young Moroccans managed to enter the city of Ceuta, overcoming all kinds of control by the…
Change and center in France- illusion or a possibility
Upcoming presidential elections in France will be quite interesting.[1] The only thing certain about them is that Macron is leaving-…
Ceuta, one month since the invasion and collapse
A month has passed since Morocco forcibly brought more than 100,000 of its citizens into the Spanish city of Ceuta. An…
However, in 2015, Colombia suspended aerial spraying with glyphosate, one of Washington’s key tools in crop eradication, triggering the first warnings.
Under Iván Duque, Colombia attempted to stay in step with Donald Trump, especially in its stance against the regimes of Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Even so, anti-drug cooperation began to show signs of fatigue. In 2020, for the first time in nearly three decades, the United States dismissed Colombia as a reliable partner in the fight against drugs, citing the record increase in coca cultivation.
The election of Gustavo Petro in 2022 marked a turning point. The first leftist president in Colombian history, he came to power with the intention of breaking with the historical subordination to Washington. His anti-drug strategy abandoned a punitive and militarized logic, opting instead for a focus on public health, rural development, and social justice.
This shift was met with skepticism in the United States. Despite attempts at dialogue, such as the meeting between Petro and Biden in April 2023, the rift deepened. On the military front, Petro refused to collaborate in the war in Ukraine, refused to send weapons to Washington, and announced the end of US arms purchases, opting for self-sufficiency. Meanwhile, China emerged as a key new player. In October 2023, Petro traveled to Beijing to elevate relations with Xi Jinping to the level of “strategic partners.” In 2024, Colombia formally joined the Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2025, it joined the BRICS Development Bank.
Finally, in September 2025, the United States again announced the desertification of Colombia, deepening the rift. Petro responded harshly, calling the decision “rude” and recalling Colombia’s sacrifice in human lives. Given this scenario, one wonders whether relations between Colombia and the United States will be definitively severed. Everything indicates no… at least not immediately. Commercial interdependence and active diplomatic channels still guarantee a minimum of stability.
However, the strategic alliance as we knew it no longer exists. We are facing a new era of pragmatic, casual relations without structural trust. Colombia is paving the way for strategic diversification.
The relationship with Beijing extends beyond the economic sphere. Even so, it poses obvious risks as the country is undergoing a pivotal moment in its foreign policy. A commitment to a more sovereign diplomacy could represent a historic opportunity to redefine its role in the international order. But it also poses enormous challenges: the risk of isolation, the weakening of key alliances, and dependence on powers with foreign interests.
In this context of geopolitical reconfiguration, where the world order is moving toward a multipolar logic, the room for maneuver is narrowing and strategic prudence becomes indispensable. The future of the relationship with the United States, the rapprochement with China, and regional autonomy will ultimately depend on the Colombian state’s ability to make firm decisions without losing its institutional anchorage or its democratic horizon.
