For more than three decades, Colombia and the United States built a strategic alliance that set the tone for hemispheric cooperation in Latin America. Forged in the context of the fight against drug trafficking, institutional strengthening, and bilateral trade, this relationship was seen as a model of stability and shared responsibility.
However, that era appears to be coming to an end. Today, more than a strategic relationship, what is projected is a tense, ideologically driven, and fracturing partnership, marked by a deep political disagreement between the administration of President Gustavo Petro and the US government. This crisis did not emerge overnight.
It is the result of a series of accumulated frictions that have weakened the foundations of one of the continent’s strongest alliances. Cooperation between Colombia and the United States was consolidated with Plan Colombia (1999-2000), through which Washington allocated millions of dollars in military and economic aid to combat cartels and insurgencies.
Under governments such as Álvaro Uribe and George W. Bush, this alliance reached its peak, with an agreement even being signed to allow US troops access to Colombian military bases in 2009. With the arrival of Juan Manuel Santos and Barack Obama’s support for the Peace Agreement in 2016, the focus shifted toward post-conflict.
The Illusion of Peace in the Middle East
The Middle East remains mired in cycles of conflict and apparent truce. Normalisation agreements between Israel and Arab countries (the…
Elections in Armenia: Between Multipolarity and Unipolarity
The upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia on 7 June go far beyond domestic politics; rather, they represent a geopolitical dualism…
Demolishing myths with “Sovereignty”
“Demolishing myths” interviewed Juan Antonio Aguilar to learn about and understand in depth various geopolitical files. Our specialist, in response to…
Venezuela: Between Sovereignty, the Left, and the American Right
On the night of January 3 of this year, during a military operation in Venezuela, President Nicolás Maduro and his…
The struggle for a Multipolar Order from within the Western
Given the situation in the world, what would be normal and foreseeable would be a rise in anti-Yankee and anti-Zionist…
Mercenarism, hypocrisy and controlled dissidence in Colombia
Less than five months before the end of his term, Colombian President Gustavo Petro sanctioned on March 17 of this…
Armenia at the crossroads: between national sovereignty and Western geopolitical
The acceleration of the rapprochement between Armenia and the EU in 2025 and 2026 represents one of the most relevant…
Claudia Sheinbaum and Ursula von der Leyen confront Trump
“The AGM is the most comprehensive agreement that Mexico has negotiated with the European Union. It brings together trade, political…
The End of the Unipolar Era: Summit of Xi and
The summit between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin (19–20 May 2026 in Beijing) confirms a major historical shift: the post-Cold…
However, in 2015, Colombia suspended aerial spraying with glyphosate, one of Washington’s key tools in crop eradication, triggering the first warnings.
Under Iván Duque, Colombia attempted to stay in step with Donald Trump, especially in its stance against the regimes of Venezuela, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Even so, anti-drug cooperation began to show signs of fatigue. In 2020, for the first time in nearly three decades, the United States dismissed Colombia as a reliable partner in the fight against drugs, citing the record increase in coca cultivation.
The election of Gustavo Petro in 2022 marked a turning point. The first leftist president in Colombian history, he came to power with the intention of breaking with the historical subordination to Washington. His anti-drug strategy abandoned a punitive and militarized logic, opting instead for a focus on public health, rural development, and social justice.
This shift was met with skepticism in the United States. Despite attempts at dialogue, such as the meeting between Petro and Biden in April 2023, the rift deepened. On the military front, Petro refused to collaborate in the war in Ukraine, refused to send weapons to Washington, and announced the end of US arms purchases, opting for self-sufficiency. Meanwhile, China emerged as a key new player. In October 2023, Petro traveled to Beijing to elevate relations with Xi Jinping to the level of “strategic partners.” In 2024, Colombia formally joined the Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2025, it joined the BRICS Development Bank.
Finally, in September 2025, the United States again announced the desertification of Colombia, deepening the rift. Petro responded harshly, calling the decision “rude” and recalling Colombia’s sacrifice in human lives. Given this scenario, one wonders whether relations between Colombia and the United States will be definitively severed. Everything indicates no… at least not immediately. Commercial interdependence and active diplomatic channels still guarantee a minimum of stability.
However, the strategic alliance as we knew it no longer exists. We are facing a new era of pragmatic, casual relations without structural trust. Colombia is paving the way for strategic diversification.
The relationship with Beijing extends beyond the economic sphere. Even so, it poses obvious risks as the country is undergoing a pivotal moment in its foreign policy. A commitment to a more sovereign diplomacy could represent a historic opportunity to redefine its role in the international order. But it also poses enormous challenges: the risk of isolation, the weakening of key alliances, and dependence on powers with foreign interests.
In this context of geopolitical reconfiguration, where the world order is moving toward a multipolar logic, the room for maneuver is narrowing and strategic prudence becomes indispensable. The future of the relationship with the United States, the rapprochement with China, and regional autonomy will ultimately depend on the Colombian state’s ability to make firm decisions without losing its institutional anchorage or its democratic horizon.
